International funding for peacebuilding: Will COVID-19 change or reinforce existing trends?

COVID-19 has exacerbated factors influencing international support for peacebuilding, including a more volatile geopolitical order and changes in domestic priorities in donor countries. Peacebuilding and a conflict-sensitive approach have not yet been at the forefront of the international responses to COVID-19, undermining attempts to ‘build back better’ in a world where negative conflict dynamics are increasingly apparent.

This paper takes stock of trends in financial support for peacebuilding, building on ECDPM’s 2018 study ‘Supporting peacebuilding in times of change’. While official aid for peacebuilding has never been higher going into the crisis, peacebuilding is a comparatively low priority which relies on a small number of donors. As such, peacebuilding is vulnerable to shrinking aid budgets and donors’ shifting priorities as a result of COVID-19. Philanthropic support – while having a unique role – has so far been limited compared to support to other areas and the scale of official support.

The pandemic, together with growing questions about racial justice and the decolonisation of international relations and development, will also push the overall aid system to evolve. These developments will profoundly impact the predominantly Western-funded international peacebuilding sector in 2021 and beyond.

More adaptation and engagement is needed from an already vulnerable peacebuilding community. Transformational change – towards building consistent political and financial support – will require articulating the relevance of peacebuilding in a (post-)COVID-19 world for the dominant economic and climate-related themes of recovery. In the long run, these evolutions may well lead to more locally-led, diverse and sustainable approaches to peacebuilding, but the transition will certainly be turbulent, and the forces for change don’t necessarily all point in a positive direction.

 

Read the full paper here.

This blog first appeared on the ECDPM site. 

Author: Pauline Veron with Andrew Sherriff, ECDPM. 

Image courtesy of Rain Love AMR via Flickr.

The views are those of the author and not necessarily those of ETTG.

In the framework of this project we produced

(Blog) How the EU can Leverage FfD4 to Strengthen its International Partnerships

ETTG – AFD:Setting the scene for the 4th international conference on Financing for Development

FfD4: Exploring Priorities for Asia

 

Aligning Climate Action and Development through SDG Financing: The Role of FfD4

More publications

Donors, implementing agencies and DFI/PDB cooperation. EBRD and donors comprehensive coordination

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) has longstanding experience in coordinating and working with donors. The EBRD relationship with donors takes different forms, such as co-financing (e.g., grant support, concessional finance and guarantees), technical assistance and policy dialogues. The focus ranges from strategic considerations to more concrete actions. The relationship can be materialised through donor facilities, such as the Green Climate Fund, or through EBRD-established multi-donor funds, agreements with bilateral donor countries, such as the United States, Switzerland and Japan, or collaborations with the European Union (EU), for example, involving the European Commission and several EU member states.

Read more >
Scroll to Top

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/u305468823/domains/ettg.eu/public_html/wp-content/plugins/adapta-rgpd/lib/vendor/Mustache/Tokenizer.php on line 110
This website uses its own cookies for its correct functioning. By clicking on the Accept button, you accept the use of these technologies and the processing of your data for these purposes.   
Privacidad