Covid-19 and food security: novel pathways and data collection to improve research and monitoring efforts

11, August 2021
Covid-19, ODI
COVID-19, Crisis, Food, Food security, Jobs and Livelihoods, Pandemic, Value Chains

Covid-19 immediately triggered food security concerns. Early in the pandemic, the World Food Programme estimated that Covid-19 will double the number of people facing food crises from 130 million to 265 million in 2020. The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the World Health Organization followed suit, suggesting that levels of hunger around the world could increase dramatically due to the impact of the pandemic on jobs, incomes and livelihoods.

In this policy brief, we set the frame to think about the pandemic’s impacts on food security by summarising evidence on the hypothesised causal links.

Key messages

The Covid-19 pandemic may create new types of food insecurity. These are focused not on food supply, but rather on the indirect effects of mobility restrictions and social distancing measures on household purchasing power and access to food.
Existing food insecurity forecasting systems may need to be complemented with additional data and methods to capture these novel pathways of food insecurity.
So far, evidence on Covid-19’s effects on food demand (e.g. household purchasing power) is mixed. The impact on food supply is limited to certain supply chains for inputs and higher-value, perishable foods.
The effects vary strongly by context, possibly due to the role of relief packages. More information is required on social protection coverage, including of low-income households and informal workers.
Evidence also suggests that actors in the informal midstream food supply chain played an important role in explaining the resilience of food systems in low- and middle-income countries. However, they are often overlooked in current data collection and research efforts.

Download the policy paper here.

This publication first appeared on the ODI site here.

Authors: Joseph Feyertag, Lou Munden, Roger Calow, Stephen Gelb, Anna McCord and Nathaniel Mason.

Photo by Jérémy Stenuit on Unsplash.

The views are those of the authors and not necessarily those of ETTG.

More publications

Financing Multilateralism: 3 MFF Scenarios for UN Funding

1 July 2026

“The 2028-2034 Multi-Annual Financial Framework: Three scenarios on the potential future of EU financing for global multilateralism“ The ETTG policy brief by Ronny Patz and Niels Keijzer, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS) asks a simple but consequential question: when the EU negotiates its next long-term budget for 2028

From Sevilla to Implementation: The Post-FfD4 Agenda on Financing for Development

10 March 2026

March, 2026 The 4th International Conference on Financing for Development (FfD4) in Sevilla concluded with a rare moment of global consensus: the Sevilla Commitment. However, as the initial diplomatic success settles, the international community faces the more arduous task of turning a shared roadmap into measurable progress. This latest policy